Why do the democrats think that the American Public is entitled to health insurance? Nothing in the constitution guarantees this. Why do they think that they should be able to take away from one person and give to another? This is what this is truly about.
In order to pay for this program the money has to come from somewhere. Unfortunately, it comes from the wealthy to pay for the poor. If you take money from the wealthy then they have
to cut back on things like jobs for the poor.
Obama seems to be all for giving the government powers that it should never have. Things like Czars, limiting executive pay, and healthcare. Put the power back where it belongs, in the free market with the people.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Political Correctness
I don't know when one person's freedom of speech became more important than anothers, but that is what Political Correctness means to me. Everyone worries about hurting another persons feelings.
Look, if someones a jackass they are a jackass. No need to sugar coat it or change the wording to spare their feelings. That is your belief, and should be as protected as their feelings.
Then there is the issue of God. 95% of the entire world believe in a higher being. Why should we have to relent to the 5% that do not believe.
Why is it that only the minority in a belief seem to be the only ones that are protected? That seems to be the way the US looks at it today.
I should have as much right to say the pledge of allegiance as you do not to say it. I should have as much right to pray as you do not to pray. If you don't want to hear it then get the hell out of the room. I bet more people want to pray or pledge with me than want to not do them with you.
These are just a couple of examples, but there are hundreds more. If you don't agree with me that is fine(that is your freedom), but that is What I Think(my freedom). I just want both our freedoms to be the same.
Look, if someones a jackass they are a jackass. No need to sugar coat it or change the wording to spare their feelings. That is your belief, and should be as protected as their feelings.
Then there is the issue of God. 95% of the entire world believe in a higher being. Why should we have to relent to the 5% that do not believe.
Why is it that only the minority in a belief seem to be the only ones that are protected? That seems to be the way the US looks at it today.
I should have as much right to say the pledge of allegiance as you do not to say it. I should have as much right to pray as you do not to pray. If you don't want to hear it then get the hell out of the room. I bet more people want to pray or pledge with me than want to not do them with you.
These are just a couple of examples, but there are hundreds more. If you don't agree with me that is fine(that is your freedom), but that is What I Think(my freedom). I just want both our freedoms to be the same.
Drilling in ANWAR
I think it's strange that the stance anyone takes on ANWAR is that it will be years before we realize any oil from drilling there. One thing is certain, if we wait it will always be years before we get oil from there.
Gas prices have dropped a little bit so the argument is not as prominent as it was a couple of months ago. I just don't like knowing that next time gas prices as skyrocketing someone is going to tell me it will be years before we can affect it. If we drill now while the prices are dropping a little bit they will lower, and then lower again when we get oil from the site.
This sounds like a win/win situation to me, and that's what I think.
Gas prices have dropped a little bit so the argument is not as prominent as it was a couple of months ago. I just don't like knowing that next time gas prices as skyrocketing someone is going to tell me it will be years before we can affect it. If we drill now while the prices are dropping a little bit they will lower, and then lower again when we get oil from the site.
This sounds like a win/win situation to me, and that's what I think.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
new to me
This is new to me, so I will just pick a topic. First will be Sarah Palin. My first thought is how funny it is that we worry how she will be able to be vice-president with 5 kids, but never ask how Obama will be able to be president since he has kids.
If Obama's wife can watch the kids while he runs the country, why can't her husband watch the kids while she's second in command? She has been governor of a state for 2 years with it working like that.
I know you will look at this post and say that I am Republican, but I am not even registered to vote. I just call it like I see it. And a woman with an 85% approval rating can't be all bad.
I can continue with this topic later, or suggest a topic. I will try to talk about anything, and it will be just what my title says, "What I think".
If Obama's wife can watch the kids while he runs the country, why can't her husband watch the kids while she's second in command? She has been governor of a state for 2 years with it working like that.
I know you will look at this post and say that I am Republican, but I am not even registered to vote. I just call it like I see it. And a woman with an 85% approval rating can't be all bad.
I can continue with this topic later, or suggest a topic. I will try to talk about anything, and it will be just what my title says, "What I think".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)